Screening Equation Numbers & Use in Prime Numbers & Twin Numbers [on hold]

Screening Equation Numbers & Use in Prime Numbers & Twin Numbers [on hold]


This Equation Is True?
You Never Can Divide Outputs Of The Equation (100X^2)+(160X)+(59) To
Numbers (3,13,23,33,43,...) Or Numbers (7,17,27,37,47,57,...).
The All Outputs This Equation Are or Prime Numbers Or Just Divide To
Numbers (11,31,41,61,...) And Numbers (19,29,59,79,...).
With Selection Special Inputs To This Equation , Always We Can Have Prime
Numbers In Outputs That For Sample If (X) is equal to the following
values:
(2^27) or (2^97) or (2^267) or (2^287) or (2^797) or (2^1287) or (2^2817)
or ... Then All Outputs Is Prime Numbers.
Please Numbers To Note (27 , 287 , 2817 , ...) For download the zip file
tester software and this article. Please visit : http://www.nerset.com
Download tester software : http://www.nerset.com/2/azmayeshgar/tester.zip
Please be careful !!!
For Sample : X = 59 ---> (100X^2)+(160X)+(59) ---> 357599 --->
factor(357599) ---> 11*19*29*59 ---> Is not prime with unit number (3) or
(7).
This equation does not directly generate prime numbers.
This equation screening unit numbers.
(9) of the numbers divisible unit (3) and (7) Only the specific inputs (2
^ 27)
or (2 ^ 287) or (2 ^ 2817) to choose output primes are.
I Test This Equation By Input 1 to 10000 Fully.
You Can Test This Equation By This Tester Software & Input 1 to 9 million.
This equation is only one of the numbers to be screened equation
And There are probably an infinite number of equations.
But they all have the same structure.
These equations can not even describe the structure of twin numbers.
Equations never decompose numbers in the output unit numbers (3) like
(3,13,23,33, ...) or unit numbers (7) as (7,17,27,37,47, ... Missing)
This equation has a very elegant proof is in the numbers.
You can visit my website for more reviews.
Unfortunately I can not speak English well.
I've translated the text into Google translate to English.